Evidence and audit trail
Keep the reason with the result.
Intelliger records what the worker used, what it inferred, which controls ran, who reviewed the case and what action was taken.
The question
Can an independent reviewer reconstruct what happened without asking the worker to explain itself?
Sources linked
Reasoning state recorded
Approvals attributable
Actions reconstructable
Evidence before explanation
A confident answer is not an audit trail.
01Enterprise teams need more than generated rationale. They need the actual source records, the procedure and model version, the checks performed, the unresolved gaps and the accountable person behind an approval.
02The evidence trail is created as the case moves, not reconstructed after an incident. This gives operations, assurance and audit teams one inspectable history of the work.
Case record
Build the record at the same time as the work.
Each event adds context to one continuous case history.
- 01
Ingest
Register the case trigger and approved source records.
- 02
Link
Connect checks and conclusions to supporting evidence.
- 03
Escalate
Record uncertainty and route the complete context.
- 04
Approve
Attribute the decision to the accountable role.
- 05
Retain
Store the outcome and action history under policy.
Assurance controls
Make the record useful without exposing more data than necessary.
Access, retention and export controls are defined for the deployment and its accountable teams.
Worker responsibility
Capture the minimum evidence needed to reconstruct the result.
Retention and access can be configured to the process, deployment and data classification.
Source provenance
Link each material fact to the approved record and version it came from.
Workflow events
Record checks, tool calls, exceptions, escalations and state changes.
Review evidence
Attribute comments, corrections and approvals to the responsible role.
Action receipts
Retain what changed, under which authority and with which outcome.
Accountable role
Human judgement and approval
Decisions with material, regulated or professional consequences stay with the named accountable role.
Measure whether reviewers can trust and reconstruct the work.
The trail should reduce evidence gaps and review effort while improving attribution.
- 01Evidence coverage
- 02Unlinked claims
- 03Record completeness
- 04Review minutes
- 05Correction rate
- 06Reconstruction time
Choose your next question
See how evidence supports decisions and authority.
Inspect one case
Start with a process where evidence is expensive to reconstruct.
We will map the required record, review roles and retention boundary for a controlled worker.