Put the right person at the decision point.
Define what an AI worker may read, prepare and execute. Put approval where responsibility changes hands, with the evidence a reviewer needs to decide.
- 01
Worker prepares
Assemble the case and proposed action.
- 02
Person reviews
Inspect evidence, uncertainty and limits.
- 03
Approved action
Proceed only within the agreed authority.
Process context
Give reviewers the whole decision.
An approval needs more than a button. Present the proposed action, its supporting records and what remains uncertain. Name the role that can approve, return or reject the case.
- Proposed action
- Supporting evidence
- Open questions
- Authorised reviewer
Control boundary
Decide what happens when approval is absent.
If an approver is unavailable, authority expires or the case changes, the process needs an explicit next state. Agree pause, return and escalation rules before enabling consequential actions.
- Pause before the restricted action
- Return incomplete cases
- Escalate to the accountable role
Explore further
Continue exploring.
Related solutions and resources
Start with one boundary you can test.
Tell us which agents, systems and decisions need control. We will define the scope and evaluation criteria together.
Talk to Intelliger