Skip to main content
Intelliger

Audit and inspection

Cut the preparation and follow-up around every inspection.

An inspection worker builds the review pack, identifies evidence gaps and keeps findings connected to corrective actions. Inspectors keep the engineering or regulated judgement.

The operational problem

Inspectors should arrive ready to inspect, not ready to hunt for records.

Before the review, teams locate current records, reconcile versions and chase gaps. After it, the same people follow findings through corrective action and assemble closure evidence.

The worker takes on that preparation and follow-through. The authorised inspector still sets severity, accepts the finding and decides whether the evidence is sufficient to close it.

Inspection lifecycle

Keep one evidence thread from scope to closure.

The worker keeps the scope, evidence, findings and closure record connected.

Stage 01

Scope

Determine what is due and which procedure applies.

Process continuity

The record moves forward to prepare.

Next stage
Human responsibility

Keep professional judgement with the accountable role.

The worker prepares and tests the evidence. Approval, severity and acceptance remain assigned to accountable roles.

Worker responsibility

Preparation and follow-through

Configure responsibilities against the applicable procedure, evidence standard and approval model.

Prepare the scope

Identify applicable assets, records, controls and prior findings.

Validate evidence

Check presence, currency, provenance and internal consistency.

Prepare findings

Structure observed gaps against the relevant requirement.

Track closure

Link corrective actions and completion evidence back to the finding.

Accountable role

Human judgement and approval

Decisions with material, regulated or professional consequences stay with the named accountable role.
Approval of inspection scope
Review of material findings
Severity and risk classification
Acceptance of corrective actions
Closure approval
Escalation of incomplete or conflicting evidence
What to measure

Measure whether inspectors get time back without losing quality.

Use process measures that reflect preparation, review quality and closure, not a generic AI score.
  • 01Preparation time
  • 02Missing-record rate
  • 03Review time
  • 04Evidence completeness
  • 05Repeat findings
  • 06Closure cycle time

Start with one inspection

Bring one recurring inspection and its recent case files.

Use representative cases to define the worker boundary and the measures that would demonstrate value.